Trump’s Swamp: Competitiveness and
Its Impact on 2017 Expiring Contracts 

Achieving a balance in vendor competition is critical for agencies looking to get a better deal and higher quality products and services. It also prompts industry to aggressively pursue the development of improved solutions. As industry transitions to the Trump era, competition will play a major role in agencies’ ability to deliver on a new set of policies.

This latest Govini analytic report provides an in-depth look at competition across the Federal government by ranking agencies based on the number of competing bids for contracts set to expire in 2017.

Highlights Include:

  • Some of the most competitive agencies including Department of Education, State, and Army are becoming even more competitive.
  • DHS is refreshing contracts supporting border protection and immigration, two areas that will be increased in the next budget cycle.
  • DOE will prioritize National Nuclear Security over Energy Programs.
  • Contractors should brace for massive disruption at EPA.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Navy

$95.8B Contract Spend 8.8%

Navy

$159.3B Budget Authority 6.6%

Navy

89.1K Contracts 4.4%

Navy

24.3K Vendors 1.3%

Army

$76.0B Contract Spend 6.2%

Army

$123.3 Budget Authority 2.7%

Army

74.1K Contracts 6.3%

Army

29.2K Vendors 2.8%

Air Force

$68.9B Contract Spend 21.8%

Air Force

$145.7 Budget Authority 6.2%

Air Force

41.5K Contracts 1.0%

Air Force

17.4K Vendors 1.3%

Health and Human Services

$22.8B Contract Spend 5.1%%

The 2017 Federal Scorecard

Introducing The 2017 Federal Scorecard, the premier annual ranking of vendors and agencies. This publication provides clarity into the murky Federal Market, distilling millions of data points into intelligence you can use to create and connect your strategy to win Federal Business.

Access The 2017 Federal Scorecard
Scroll Up